This has been an interesting week. The original plan was for Jonathan to be admitted on Sunday - 26th March - to start his immunotherapy treatment on Monday - 27th March - but, unfortunately, that didn't happen. On Sunday afternoon we 'discovered' that Jonathan had a fever. Just after 12:30 pm, Jonathan's temperature was around 102.3 F. We took his temperature again just after 1 pm and it had risen to 103.7 F. This wasn't good. It meant that we had to call it in. Since we were already going to be admitted to 2 North - I thought we could have just checked in earlier. What I found out instead is that the 'Fellow' (and the Attending) wanted us to go to ER to have them treat Jonathan first, prior to being admitted to 2 North.
In the past, we've been told that one of the reasons why we go to ER is that 2 North cannot admit directly. My thinking was that we could go directly to 2 North, this time, because Jonathan was already scheduled to be admitted. Unfortunately that didn't happen. The reason told to us is that ER would be more prepared to deal with a kid 'crashing'. Now, the reason I was opposed to going to the ER was that it takes so long, and the doctors there are not pediatric doctors so their manner of treating kids is not the same, etc, etc. But I was assured that it wouldn't take very long and that there was a new section in ER for kids.
Going off topic - so that I remember the events clearly.
When I first called to report that Jonathan had a temperature of 103.7 F I was in disbelieve that the doctor actually wanted us to go to ER and not to 2 North. I made sure that he was clear with explaining his logic to me, i.e. 2 North not being able to treat kids that are 'crashing'. Although his logic made sense - his logic is based on the 'general' rules and IMO if you have proper continuity of care, then doctors would be familiar with the specific traits and previous history of the patient.
My next call was to the ward directly, 2 North, to verify if the room was already available. I wanted to verify if there was another motive for having us go to ER without telling us. The room was not ready, and it was going to be ready by 6 pm because a patient was checking out that afternoon. During this call with the charge nurse, the 'Attending' came on the phone and I got the entire explanation again - but this time I was told that there is a new 'wing' just for pediatrics - so our experience would be much better.
In the end - I don't think there were any other reasons that the doctors just wanted to play it save - and given who the doctors were that night - conservative - it made sense for their decision.
By Monday we found out that Jonathan's blood culture had grew out the 'staff' bacteria. This made it the fourth time that Jonathan has gotten this bacteria. He got it in rounds: 1, 2, 4 and 5. By Monday night or Tuesday - we found out that his urine sample had also grown out another bacteria - so Jonathan was on antibiotics to treat both types.
Originally, when we found out that Jonathan was having fevers, we figured that they were due to Jonathan 'catching' Arielle's cold from last week. During the previous week, Arielle had fevers, runny nose and some coughing, and try as you might to keep the sick person separated, once one person in the family gets sick, the entire family gets it.
By Monday / Tuesday, Jonathan started to cough. It was one of those dry, non-stop, coughs that goes on and on and on. By Wednesday, Jonathan's daily blood cultures were still growing bacteria, and with his coughing, the Attending wanted an X-Ray to rule out any possible pneumonia. His X-Rays came back clear, but the 'Attending' had already decided to bring up the topic of taking out his Hickman catheter. The thinking was that his catheter may be 'seeded' with bacteria and hence the reason why he keeps getting these reoccurrences. It was also discussed during the other rounds as well - but in the fourth round we found out that the IL-2 drug, in about 10 to 15 percent of the cases, made kids more susceptible for getting a bacterial infection. Here is the text we got about the effect from IL-2:
... it may not be that his line is colonized. if you have been using both lumens at home it is more likely that it's the immunotherapy. IL-2 causes a reversible defect in neutrophil function and patients are at an increased risk of gram-positive bacterial infections.
In the end, I decided that I would take the recommendation of the doctors and have his Hickman catheter removed. For some reason my gut feeling was that it should be removed and since my gut feelings have been the one entity that has helped me to make all my decisions with Jonathan's care - I could not ignore it. Mind you, this was not an easy decision to make, although the procedure itself is very simple and only lasts a couple minutes. I guess what I was hesitant about was having to go through the process of taking it out and then putting it back in ... but too late now ... the decision has already been made.